{"id":3997,"date":"2018-03-09T13:29:33","date_gmt":"2018-03-09T16:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cofecon.org.br\/?p=3997"},"modified":"2018-03-09T13:29:33","modified_gmt":"2018-03-09T16:29:33","slug":"ipca-variou-032-em-fevereiro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/?p=3997","title":{"rendered":"IPCA variou 0,32% em fevereiro"},"content":{"rendered":"

O\u00a0\u00cdndice Nacional de Pre\u00e7os ao Consumidor Amplo (IPCA)<\/strong>\u00a0de fevereiro variou 0,32%, superando em 0,03 ponto percentual (p.p.) o resultado de janeiro (0,29%).\u00a0<\/big><\/span><\/p>\n

Este foi o IPCA mais baixo para os meses de fevereiro desde o ano 2000, quando se situou em 0,13%. O acumulado nos dois primeiros meses do ano est\u00e1 em 0,61%, menor percentual para o per\u00edodo desde a implanta\u00e7\u00e3o do Plano Real em 1994. Em 2017, o acumulado no primeiro bimestre havia sido 0,71%. O acumulado dos \u00faltimos doze meses ficou em 2,84% e foi o menor para um m\u00eas de fevereiro desde 1999 (2,24%).<\/big><\/span><\/p>\n

Em fevereiro de 2017, o IPCA havia sido 0,33%.<\/big><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Per\u00edodo<\/strong><\/span><\/th>\nTAXA<\/strong><\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
FEVEREIRO de 2018<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n0,32%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro de 2018<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n0,29%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fevereiro de 2017<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n0,33%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acumulado no ano<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n0,61%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acumulado nos 12 meses<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n2,84%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Em fevereiro, o grupo\u00a0Educa\u00e7\u00e3o<\/strong>, com alta de 3,89% e impacto de 0,19 p.p., dominou o IPCA, sendo respons\u00e1vel por 59% dele. Em contrapartida, o grupo\u00a0Alimenta\u00e7\u00e3o e Bebidas<\/strong>\u00a0apresentou queda de 0,33%, contribuindo para conter o \u00edndice, com seu impacto de -0,08 p.p. Os resultados dos grupos de produtos e servi\u00e7os pesquisados est\u00e3o na tabela a seguir.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Grupo<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o (%)<\/span><\/th>\nImpacto (p.p.)\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro<\/span><\/th>\nJaneiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00cdndice Geral<\/span><\/td>\n0,29<\/span><\/td>\n0,32<\/span><\/td>\n0,29<\/span><\/td>\n0,32\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alimenta\u00e7\u00e3o e Bebidas<\/span><\/td>\n0,74<\/span><\/td>\n-0,33<\/span><\/td>\n0,18<\/span><\/td>\n-0,08\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Habita\u00e7\u00e3o<\/span><\/td>\n-0,85<\/span><\/td>\n0,22<\/span><\/td>\n-0,13<\/span><\/td>\n0,03\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Artigos de Resid\u00eancia<\/span><\/td>\n0,14<\/span><\/td>\n0,03<\/span><\/td>\n0,01<\/span><\/td>\n0,00\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vestu\u00e1rio<\/span><\/td>\n-0,98<\/span><\/td>\n-0,38<\/span><\/td>\n-0,06<\/span><\/td>\n-0,02\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Transportes<\/span><\/td>\n1,10<\/span><\/td>\n0,74<\/span><\/td>\n0,20<\/span><\/td>\n0,13\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sa\u00fade e Cuidados Pessoais<\/span><\/td>\n0,42<\/span><\/td>\n0,38<\/span><\/td>\n0,05<\/span><\/td>\n0,05\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Despesas Pessoais<\/span><\/td>\n0,22<\/span><\/td>\n0,17<\/span><\/td>\n0,03<\/span><\/td>\n0,02\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Educa\u00e7\u00e3o<\/span><\/td>\n0,22<\/span><\/td>\n3,89<\/span><\/td>\n0,01<\/span><\/td>\n0,19\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Comunica\u00e7\u00e3o<\/span><\/td>\n0,11<\/span><\/td>\n0,05<\/span><\/td>\n0,00<\/span><\/td>\n0,00\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

A alta de 3,89% no grupo Educa\u00e7\u00e3o reflete os reajustes habitualmente praticados no in\u00edcio do ano letivo, em especial os aumentos nas mensalidades dos cursos regulares, cujos valores subiram 5,23%, gerando o mais elevado impacto individual sobre o \u00edndice do m\u00eas (0,16 p.p.). Regionalmente, os cursos regulares tiveram aumentos entre os 4,40% de S\u00e3o Paulo e os 8,02% de Goi\u00e2nia.<\/span><\/p>\n

Diferentemente dos anos anteriores, foram captadas em fevereiro as varia\u00e7\u00f5es dos cursos regulares de Fortaleza. Anteriormente, devido \u00e0 diferen\u00e7a no per\u00edodo de reajuste, as varia\u00e7\u00f5es desta regi\u00e3o eram incorporadas ao \u00edndice em mar\u00e7o. A seguir tabela com os resultados do grupo Educa\u00e7\u00e3o por regi\u00e3o pesquisada.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Regi\u00e3o<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o (%)<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Fevereiro<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Goi\u00e2nia<\/span><\/td>\n5,81<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Recife<\/span><\/td>\n4,78<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bel\u00e9m<\/span><\/td>\n4,68<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio de Janeiro<\/span><\/td>\n4,57<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Curitiba<\/span><\/td>\n4,35<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fortaleza<\/span><\/td>\n4,22<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Salvador<\/span><\/td>\n4,03<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Campo Grande<\/span><\/td>\n3,99<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vit\u00f3ria<\/span><\/td>\n3,68<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S\u00e3o Paulo<\/span><\/td>\n3,51<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Alegre<\/span><\/td>\n3,29<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Belo Horizonte<\/span><\/td>\n3,20<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bras\u00edlia<\/span><\/td>\n3,13<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasil<\/span><\/td>\n3,89<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

O grupo dos\u00a0Transportes<\/strong>\u00a0apresentou varia\u00e7\u00e3o de 0,74%, contribuindo com 0,13 p.p. de impacto no \u00edndice de fevereiro. Os destaques no grupo foram os itens \u00f4nibus urbano (1,90%) e a gasolina (0,85%). Neste \u00faltimo, as varia\u00e7\u00f5es nas \u00e1reas oscilaram entre -3,70% em Fortaleza e 8,55% em Salvador. Com rela\u00e7\u00e3o aos \u00f4nibus urbanos, destaca-se o aumento de 6,38% de Goi\u00e2nia. Ainda nos Transportes, cabe destacar a varia\u00e7\u00e3o de 1,73% no item t\u00e1xi, reflexo do reajuste de 7,39% no Rio de Janeiro (5,94%), em vigor desde 24 de janeiro.<\/span><\/p>\n

Por outro lado, o grupo\u00a0Alimenta\u00e7\u00e3o e Bebidas<\/strong>, com varia\u00e7\u00e3o de -0,33%, contribuiu para conter a taxa do IPCA de janeiro para fevereiro. Considerando os alimentos para consumo em casa, com exce\u00e7\u00e3o de Bel\u00e9m (0,29%), as regi\u00f5es pesquisadas mostraram pre\u00e7os em queda, indo de -0,16% em Porto Alegre at\u00e9 -1,29% em Campo Grande, como mostra a tabela a seguir.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Regi\u00e3o<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o Acumulada (%)<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro<\/span><\/th>\nAno<\/span><\/th>\n12 meses<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Bel\u00e9m<\/span><\/td>\n0,78<\/span><\/td>\n0,29<\/span><\/td>\n1,07<\/span><\/td>\n-5,18<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Alegre<\/span><\/td>\n1,54<\/span><\/td>\n-0,16<\/span><\/td>\n1,38<\/span><\/td>\n-3,09<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bras\u00edlia<\/span><\/td>\n1,25<\/span><\/td>\n-0,17<\/span><\/td>\n1,08<\/span><\/td>\n-2,74<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Curitiba<\/span><\/td>\n0,89<\/span><\/td>\n-0,17<\/span><\/td>\n0,72<\/span><\/td>\n-3,29<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Recife<\/span><\/td>\n1,22<\/span><\/td>\n-0,35<\/span><\/td>\n0,87<\/span><\/td>\n-3,88<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Belo Horizonte<\/span><\/td>\n0,91<\/span><\/td>\n-0,65<\/span><\/td>\n0,25<\/span><\/td>\n-6,23<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fortaleza<\/span><\/td>\n1,04<\/span><\/td>\n-0,68<\/span><\/td>\n0,35<\/span><\/td>\n-5,01<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vit\u00f3ria<\/span><\/td>\n1,37<\/span><\/td>\n-0,80<\/span><\/td>\n0,56<\/span><\/td>\n-4,96<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Goi\u00e2nia<\/span><\/td>\n0,96<\/span><\/td>\n-0,83<\/span><\/td>\n0,12<\/span><\/td>\n-4,50<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Salvador<\/span><\/td>\n1,48<\/span><\/td>\n-0,84<\/span><\/td>\n0,63<\/span><\/td>\n-4,34<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S\u00e3o Paulo<\/span><\/td>\n0,90<\/span><\/td>\n-0,89<\/span><\/td>\n0,00<\/span><\/td>\n-2,62<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio de Janeiro<\/span><\/td>\n1,61<\/span><\/td>\n-1,06<\/span><\/td>\n0,54<\/span><\/td>\n-3,04<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Campo Grande<\/span><\/td>\n0,99<\/span><\/td>\n-1,29<\/span><\/td>\n-0,32<\/span><\/td>\n-4,61<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasil<\/span><\/td>\n1,12<\/span><\/td>\n-0,61<\/span><\/td>\n0,50<\/span><\/td>\n-3,81<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Foram v\u00e1rios os produtos importantes na mesa do brasileiro que ficaram mais baratos de um m\u00eas para o outro, a exemplo das carnes (-1,09%) e das frutas (-1,13%). As principais quedas encontram-se a seguir.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Item<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o Acumulada (%)<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro<\/span><\/th>\nAno<\/span><\/th>\n12 meses<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Alho<\/span><\/td>\n-3,31<\/span><\/td>\n-4,79<\/span><\/td>\n-7,94<\/span><\/td>\n-24,10<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cenoura<\/span><\/td>\n18,54<\/span><\/td>\n-3,88<\/span><\/td>\n13,94<\/span><\/td>\n11,61<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Batata-inglesa<\/span><\/td>\n10,85<\/span><\/td>\n-3,57<\/span><\/td>\n6,89<\/span><\/td>\n18,20<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
A\u00e7\u00facar cristal<\/span><\/td>\n0,16<\/span><\/td>\n-3,56<\/span><\/td>\n-3,41<\/span><\/td>\n-24,48<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tomate<\/span><\/td>\n45,71<\/span><\/td>\n-3,29<\/span><\/td>\n40,92<\/span><\/td>\n48,25<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feij\u00e3o-carioca<\/span><\/td>\n-3,32<\/span><\/td>\n-2,98<\/span><\/td>\n-6,20<\/span><\/td>\n-31,74<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
A\u00e7\u00facar refinado<\/span><\/td>\n-0,72<\/span><\/td>\n-2,58<\/span><\/td>\n-3,29<\/span><\/td>\n-20,58<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
P\u00e3o de forma<\/span><\/td>\n2,65<\/span><\/td>\n-1,81<\/span><\/td>\n0,79<\/span><\/td>\n-1,18<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00d3leo de soja<\/span><\/td>\n-0,87<\/span><\/td>\n-1,73<\/span><\/td>\n-2,59<\/span><\/td>\n-15,29<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Chocolate em barra e bombom<\/span><\/td>\n-0,69<\/span><\/td>\n-1,52<\/span><\/td>\n-2,20<\/span><\/td>\n-10,60<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cerveja<\/span><\/td>\n-0,29<\/span><\/td>\n-1,38<\/span><\/td>\n-1,66<\/span><\/td>\n2,49<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Biscoito<\/span><\/td>\n0,52<\/span><\/td>\n-1,37<\/span><\/td>\n-0,85<\/span><\/td>\n2,73<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Frutas<\/span><\/td>\n4,08<\/span><\/td>\n-1,13<\/span><\/td>\n2,91<\/span><\/td>\n-12,29<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Carnes<\/span><\/td>\n0,46<\/span><\/td>\n-1,09<\/span><\/td>\n-0,63<\/span><\/td>\n-2,22<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Arroz<\/span><\/td>\n-0,23<\/span><\/td>\n-1,02<\/span><\/td>\n-1,24<\/span><\/td>\n-11,34<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Chocolate e achocolatado em p\u00f3<\/span><\/td>\n0,85<\/span><\/td>\n-0,95<\/span><\/td>\n-0,11<\/span><\/td>\n-0,67<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cerveja fora<\/span><\/td>\n-0,03<\/span><\/td>\n-0,81<\/span><\/td>\n-0,84<\/span><\/td>\n2,27<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Suco de frutas<\/span><\/td>\n0,12<\/span><\/td>\n-0,79<\/span><\/td>\n-0,67<\/span><\/td>\n2,29<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Caf\u00e9 mo\u00eddo<\/span><\/td>\n-0,21<\/span><\/td>\n-0,75<\/span><\/td>\n-0,96<\/span><\/td>\n2,25<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Frango inteiro<\/span><\/td>\n-0,36<\/span><\/td>\n-0,70<\/span><\/td>\n-1,05<\/span><\/td>\n-5,72<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Frango em peda\u00e7os<\/span><\/td>\n-0,49<\/span><\/td>\n-0,65<\/span><\/td>\n-1,14<\/span><\/td>\n-3,50<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Quanto aos demais grupos, esses situaram-se entre -0,38% referente ao\u00a0Vestu\u00e1rio<\/strong>\u00a0e 0,38% de\u00a0Sa\u00fade e Cuidados Pessoais<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Na \u00f3tica dos \u00edndices regionais, o mais elevado foi o da regi\u00e3o metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro (0,72%), com destaque para o \u00f4nibus urbano, com alta de 4,71% e os cursos regulares, que subiram 5,89%. A seguir, tabela com os resultados mensais por regi\u00e3o pesquisada.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Regi\u00e3o<\/span><\/th>\nPeso Regional (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o Acumulada (%)<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro<\/span><\/th>\nAno<\/span><\/th>\n12 meses<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio de Janeiro<\/span><\/td>\n12,06<\/span><\/td>\n0,42<\/span><\/td>\n0,72<\/span><\/td>\n1,14<\/span><\/td>\n3,09<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bel\u00e9m<\/span><\/td>\n4,65<\/span><\/td>\n0,08<\/span><\/td>\n0,57<\/span><\/td>\n0,65<\/span><\/td>\n1,07<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Salvador<\/span><\/td>\n7,35<\/span><\/td>\n0,35<\/span><\/td>\n0,55<\/span><\/td>\n0,90<\/span><\/td>\n1,80<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Belo Horizonte<\/span><\/td>\n10,86<\/span><\/td>\n0,36<\/span><\/td>\n0,33<\/span><\/td>\n0,68<\/span><\/td>\n1,72<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S\u00e3o Paulo<\/span><\/td>\n30,67<\/span><\/td>\n0,21<\/span><\/td>\n0,29<\/span><\/td>\n0,50<\/span><\/td>\n3,64<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Recife<\/span><\/td>\n5,05<\/span><\/td>\n0,03<\/span><\/td>\n0,27<\/span><\/td>\n0,30<\/span><\/td>\n3,04<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Campo Grande<\/span><\/td>\n1,51<\/span><\/td>\n0,10<\/span><\/td>\n0,20<\/span><\/td>\n0,30<\/span><\/td>\n1,60<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bras\u00edlia<\/span><\/td>\n2,80<\/span><\/td>\n-0,15<\/span><\/td>\n0,19<\/span><\/td>\n0,04<\/span><\/td>\n3,10<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vit\u00f3ria<\/span><\/td>\n1,78<\/span><\/td>\n0,70<\/span><\/td>\n0,15<\/span><\/td>\n0,86<\/span><\/td>\n2,51<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Curitiba<\/span><\/td>\n7,79<\/span><\/td>\n0,26<\/span><\/td>\n0,10<\/span><\/td>\n0,36<\/span><\/td>\n3,02<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Alegre<\/span><\/td>\n8,40<\/span><\/td>\n0,68<\/span><\/td>\n0,08<\/span><\/td>\n0,76<\/span><\/td>\n2,86<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Goi\u00e2nia<\/span><\/td>\n3,59<\/span><\/td>\n0,05<\/span><\/td>\n0,07<\/span><\/td>\n0,12<\/span><\/td>\n4,08<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fortaleza<\/span><\/td>\n3,49<\/span><\/td>\n0,34<\/span><\/td>\n0,00<\/span><\/td>\n0,34<\/span><\/td>\n1,69<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasil<\/span><\/td>\n100,00<\/span><\/td>\n0,29<\/span><\/td>\n0,32<\/span><\/td>\n0,61<\/span><\/td>\n2,84<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

O IPCA \u00e9 calculado pelo IBGE desde 1980, se refere \u00e0s fam\u00edlias com rendimento monet\u00e1rio de 01 a 40 sal\u00e1rios m\u00ednimos, qualquer que seja a fonte, e abrange dez regi\u00f5es metropolitanas do pa\u00eds, al\u00e9m dos munic\u00edpios de Goi\u00e2nia, Campo Grande e de Bras\u00edlia. Para c\u00e1lculo do \u00edndice do m\u00eas foram comparados os pre\u00e7os coletados no per\u00edodo de 30 de janeiro a 01 de mar\u00e7o de 2018 (refer\u00eancia) com os pre\u00e7os vigentes no per\u00edodo de 29 de dezembro de 2017 a 29 de janeiro de 2018 (base).<\/span><\/p>\n

INPC varia 0,18% em fevereiro<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

O \u00cdndice Nacional de Pre\u00e7os ao Consumidor – INPC apresentou varia\u00e7\u00e3o de 0,18% em fevereiro e ficou 0,05 p.p. abaixo da taxa de 0,23% de janeiro. Este foi o INPC mais baixo para os meses de fevereiro desde 2000, quando se situou em 0,05%. O acumulado dos \u00faltimos doze meses desceu para 1,81%, ficando abaixo dos 1,87% registrados nos 12 meses imediatamente anteriores. Este acumulado foi o menor para o per\u00edodo desde a implanta\u00e7\u00e3o do Plano Real. Em fevereiro de 2017, o INPC registrou 0,24%.<\/span><\/p>\n

Os\u00a0produtos aliment\u00edcios<\/strong>\u00a0tiveram queda de 0,36% em fevereiro enquanto no m\u00eas anterior registraram alta de 0,76%. O agrupamento dos n\u00e3o aliment\u00edcios ficou com varia\u00e7\u00e3o de 0,41% enquanto, em janeiro, apresentaram estabilidade.<\/span><\/p>\n

Entre os \u00edndices regionais, o mais elevado foi o da regi\u00e3o metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro (0,65%), onde se destacaram os itens \u00f4nibus urbano (4,71%), refei\u00e7\u00e3o fora (2,25%) e os cursos regulares (5,99%). O menor \u00edndice foi o de Goi\u00e2nia (-0,03%), reflexo da queda de 5,09% da energia el\u00e9trica. A seguir, tabela com os resultados por regi\u00e3o pesquisada.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Regi\u00e3o<\/span><\/th>\nPeso Regional (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o mensal (%)<\/span><\/th>\nVaria\u00e7\u00e3o Acumulada (%)<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Janeiro<\/span><\/th>\nFevereiro<\/span><\/th>\nAno<\/span><\/th>\n12 meses<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio de Janeiro<\/span><\/td>\n9,51<\/span><\/td>\n0,24<\/span><\/td>\n0,65<\/span><\/td>\n0,89<\/span><\/td>\n1,15<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bel\u00e9m<\/span><\/td>\n7,03<\/span><\/td>\n0,11<\/span><\/td>\n0,52<\/span><\/td>\n0,63<\/span><\/td>\n0,44<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Salvador<\/span><\/td>\n10,67<\/span><\/td>\n0,28<\/span><\/td>\n0,26<\/span><\/td>\n0,54<\/span><\/td>\n1,20<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Belo Horizonte<\/span><\/td>\n10,60<\/span><\/td>\n0,16<\/span><\/td>\n0,14<\/span><\/td>\n0,30<\/span><\/td>\n0,58<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vit\u00f3ria<\/span><\/td>\n1,83<\/span><\/td>\n0,64<\/span><\/td>\n0,09<\/span><\/td>\n0,73<\/span><\/td>\n1,56<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
S\u00e3o Paulo<\/span><\/td>\n24,24<\/span><\/td>\n0,25<\/span><\/td>\n0,09<\/span><\/td>\n0,35<\/span><\/td>\n2,82<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Recife<\/span><\/td>\n7,17<\/span><\/td>\n0,02<\/span><\/td>\n0,08<\/span><\/td>\n0,10<\/span><\/td>\n2,04<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Curitiba<\/span><\/td>\n7,29<\/span><\/td>\n0,17<\/span><\/td>\n0,07<\/span><\/td>\n0,24<\/span><\/td>\n2,59<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fortaleza<\/span><\/td>\n6,61<\/span><\/td>\n0,37<\/span><\/td>\n0,04<\/span><\/td>\n0,41<\/span><\/td>\n1,22<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bras\u00edlia<\/span><\/td>\n1,88<\/span><\/td>\n-0,15<\/span><\/td>\n0,04<\/span><\/td>\n-0,12<\/span><\/td>\n1,63<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Alegre<\/span><\/td>\n7,38<\/span><\/td>\n0,59<\/span><\/td>\n0,02<\/span><\/td>\n0,61<\/span><\/td>\n2,35<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Campo Grande<\/span><\/td>\n1,64<\/span><\/td>\n0,01<\/span><\/td>\n0,00<\/span><\/td>\n0,01<\/span><\/td>\n0,33<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Goi\u00e2nia<\/span><\/td>\n4,15<\/span><\/td>\n-0,04<\/span><\/td>\n-0,03<\/span><\/td>\n-0,08<\/span><\/td>\n3,43<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasil<\/span><\/td>\n100,00<\/span><\/td>\n0,23<\/span><\/td>\n0,18<\/span><\/td>\n0,41<\/span><\/td>\n1,81<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/center><\/p>\n

Para c\u00e1lculo do \u00edndice do m\u00eas foram comparados os pre\u00e7os coletados no per\u00edodo de 30 de janeiro a 01 de mar\u00e7o de 2018 (refer\u00eancia) com os pre\u00e7os vigentes no per\u00edodo de 29 de dezembro de 2017 a 29 de janeiro de 2018 (base).<\/span><\/p>\n

O INPC \u00e9 calculado pelo IBGE desde 1979, se refere \u00e0s fam\u00edlias com rendimento monet\u00e1rio de 01 a 05 sal\u00e1rios m\u00ednimos, sendo o chefe assalariado, e abrange dez regi\u00f5es metropolitanas do pa\u00eds, al\u00e9m dos munic\u00edpios de Goi\u00e2nia, Campo Grande e de Bras\u00edlia.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

O\u00a0\u00cdndice Nacional de Pre\u00e7os ao Consumidor Amplo (IPCA)\u00a0de fevereiro variou 0,32%, superando em 0,03 ponto percentual (p.p.) o resultado de janeiro (0,29%).\u00a0 Este foi o IPCA mais baixo para os meses de fevereiro desde o ano 2000, quando se situou<\/p>\n

Leia Mais<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3998,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3997","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3997"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3997"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3997\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3998"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3997"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3997"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cofecon.org.br\/cofecon\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3997"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}